Through Halting a Harsh Conservative Social Experiment, This Budget Definitively Outlines How the Labour Party Will Wage the Struggle to Renew Britain
Just recently, the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, presented a Labour Party budget. People have been calling for Labour’s purpose and principles to be more distinctly expressed. By way of the decisions made – a transition to a more equitable tax system, targeting wealth to fund addressing child poverty, good public services and the living expenses – we have unequivocally demonstrated what we believe in.
That’s why Labour MPs cheered in the Commons, and it’s why we are ready for the battles to come. And it’s why the cries from the right began right away.
The Main Political Divide in UK Government
The primary division in British politics is yet again on the economy. On the one hand Labour, who aim to change it so it helps ordinary working people, and on the opposite side, our opponents, who support the current system and the failed ideology of the past. We must now confront, and win, the debate.
The Tories were given 14 years to resolve things and in reality, by any measure, they got far more dire. Their ideological austerity and supply-side economics – tax breaks for the wealthy, reducing investment (leaving us with low productivity and wages), and neglecting to support young people post-Covid – proved ineffective.
Legacy of Failure Under the Previous Administration
Living standards dropped by the largest margin since records began, child poverty hit record levels, NHS waiting lists in England were the highest they’ve ever been, wages were stagnant, a housing crisis became entrenched, young people affected by Covid were left on the scrapheap. The history of failure goes on.
A single budget alone can’t fix everything, so Labour has a long-term plan for renewal and for rewiring the country. And we have to go out and keep making the case for why our strategy will reap dividends.
Social Security and Child Poverty
Under the Tories, welfare spending rose substantially. As did child poverty, because they failed to tackle the root causes: low pay, high housing costs, significant inequalities in education, health and regions. The state is forced to paying more to deal with the symptoms instead of the solution.
It’s why we are constructing more affordable homes than for a generation, increasing wages and new rights for workers, greatly increasing investment in infrastructure and new industries, reducing waiting lists down and lowering the costs of childcare and energy as we pursue clean power.
Removing the Two-Child Benefit Cap
This is also the reason we are absolutely right to use this budget to remove the two-child benefit cap.
For eight long years, since it was introduced, poorer families with children have suffered from a cruel social experiment that was marketed as fair for working people when it was the opposite. Most of the families affected by it have a parent in work.
It’s done nothing but push 300,000 more children into poverty – which, ultimately, costs us more, as well as being heartless and unethical.
Tangible Effects in Communities
I know from my own constituency – where over 5,000 children will be raised out of poverty as a result of abolishing the cap – the actual impact it’s had. Children wearing £1 wellies as school shoes, children going to bed hungry and cold, living in cramped, mouldy homes, parents this Christmas relying on food banks for a simple meal or small gift for their kids.
I also see the impact on schools, teachers, social workers, doctors and charities who are already overburdened but have to redirect time and resources to supporting children who are living with the results of deep poverty.
Long-Term Effects of Child Poverty
Just one in four pupils from the poorest families achieve five good GCSEs, compared with almost 75% among wealthier families. This sets them up for the challenges they face during their lives: unrealized potential, financial struggles and ill health. Children who were raised in poverty are more likely to be jobless or poor as adults.
Confronting child poverty isn’t just a ethical duty, it is a long-term investment. Poverty costs the economy significantly more than the £3bn cost of removing the two-child cap, or extending free school meals.
This is the reason we acted urgently in the budget, despite the challenging economic context. Every day with this cap in place sees over a hundred extra children pushed into poverty. The benefits of lifting it won’t happen overnight either, so taking early action in the parliament was crucial.
The cap was a totem to 14 years of unsuccessful conservative ideology. Now it is abolished.
Equitable Funding for Policies
We, as Labour, can also be clear that these initiatives are being funded in a just way – from a new gaming tax, closing tax loopholes and a new “mansion tax”.
Final Thoughts
Equity and purpose – that’s how we will win the battle of ideas. This budget is a definitive statement that we gained the election as Labour, and will lead as Labour. As I consistently said during my campaign to become deputy leader, we must reclaim the political platform and set the agenda more strongly about what’s truly flawed with the country and how we are repairing it. We’ve definitely done that this week.
So let’s keep hold of it and win this fight about how we will rebuild Britain and address the deep inequalities holding us back.